Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 440
Filtrar
2.
Mycoses ; 67(4): e13722, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606896

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two approaches are used to manage invasive fungal disease (IFD) in febrile neutropenic patients viz. empirical therapy (without attempting to confirm the diagnosis), or pre-emptive therapy (after screening tests for IFD). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was undertaken to compare these approaches in children. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trial Registries and grey literature, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with FN suspected to have IFD. We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for quality assessment, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 7989 citations. Stepwise screening identified only one relevant RCT that administered empirical (n = 73) or pre-emptive (n = 76) antifungal therapy. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.46, 5.31), IFD mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI:0.15, 7.20) and other clinically important outcomes such as duration of fever, duration of hospitalization and proportion requiring ICU admission. There were no safety data reported. The number of days of antifungal therapy was significantly lower in the pre-emptive therapy arm. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was 'moderate'. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of data, comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with febrile neutropenia having suspected invasive fungal disease. Data from a single included trial suggests that both approaches may be comparable in research settings. Robust trials are warranted to address the gap in existing knowledge about the optimal approach in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos , Neutropenia Febril , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Niño , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control
3.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2300313, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301180

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics of children with febrile neutropenia, the associated bacterial organisms, and their sensitivity patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) pediatric oncology ward, from June 2021 to April 2022. A total of 110 children who developed fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy were enrolled. Blood samples for culture were collected aseptically. Patient characteristics were presented in frequency tables. Antimicrobial sensitivity patterns were plotted in tables against the bacterial isolates cultured. Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to determine any association between patient characteristics, bacterial growth, and antimicrobial sensitivity. RESULTS: The majority (n = 66; 60%) were males. The median age was 6.3 years (standard deviation, 3.7). The majority of patients 71 (64.5%) had hematologic malignancies, the most common being AML. There was a significant association between severity of neutropenia and hematologic malignancies (P = .028). In total, 31/110 (28.2%) blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth. Gram-positive bacteria were more frequent (n = 20; 58.1%). The most common organism was Escherichia coli (n = 6; 18.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5; 15.2%). All the isolates were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin and also showed good sensitivity toward meropenem (n = 10/11; 90.9%). High resistance to cephalosporins was noted with ceftriaxone (n = 5/6; 83.3%), cefepime (n = 4/7; 57.1%), and ceftazidime (n = 3/4; 75%). CONCLUSION: The most common malignancy associated with febrile neutropenia was AML. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common isolates. There was high resistance to cephalosporins.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Masculino , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Estudios Transversales , Kenia , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiología , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2300292, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301183

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious complication in hematologic malignancies, and lung infiltrates (LIs) remain a significant concern. An accurate microbiological diagnosis is crucial but difficult to establish. To address this, we analyzed the utility of a standardized method for performing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) along with a two-step strategy for the analysis of BAL fluid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center from November 2018 to June 2020. Patients age 15 years and older with confirmed leukemia or lymphomas undergoing chemotherapy, with presence of FN, and LIs observed on imaging were enrolled. RESULTS: Among the 122 enrolled patients, successful BAL was performed in 83.6% of cases. The study used a two-step analysis of BAL fluid, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 74.5%. Furthermore, antimicrobial therapy was modified in 63.9% of patients on the basis of BAL reports, and this population demonstrated a higher response rate (63% v 45%; P = .063). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a two-step BAL fluid analysis is safe and clinically beneficial to establish an accurate microbiological diagnosis. Given the crucial impact of diagnostic delays on mortality in hematologic malignancy patients with FN, early BAL studies should be performed to enable prompt and specific diagnosis, allowing for appropriate treatment modifications.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia , Linfoma , Adolescente , Humanos , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Neutropenia Febril/diagnóstico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/etiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patología , Leucemia/complicaciones , Leucemia/patología , Pulmón/microbiología , Pulmón/patología , Linfoma/complicaciones , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 26(2): e14236, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349035

RESUMEN

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is common among hematologic malignancy patients, including recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy. Prompt empiric antibiotic use has been the mainstay for decades but a "one-size-fits-all" approach is no longer broadly accepted, as treatment-related infectious risk are more understood. Growing antimicrobial resistance is an increasing clinical challenge. Evolving strategies on de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotics in FN without identified infection are areas of particular interest.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Infecciones , Humanos , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Infecciones/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 3816, 2024 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360906

RESUMEN

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neutropenia Febril , Filgrastim , Leucopenia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/etiología , 60500 , Docetaxel , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Leucopenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico
7.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 23(1): 16, 2024 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. METHODS: We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. RESULTS: We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Niño , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Teorema de Bayes , Hospitales Pediátricos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Bacterias , Italia , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
8.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 43(1): 33-43, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910269

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic accuracy of galactomannan measurements is highly variable depending on the study population, diagnostic procedures, and treatment procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of posaconazole prophylaxis and empiric antifungal treatment upon diagnostic accuracy of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial lavage (BL), and serum in hematological malignancy population. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in a single tertiary care center with hematologic malignancies undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with a preliminary diagnosis of IPA were retrospectively included. RESULTS: In all the study population (n = 327), AUC for BAL, BL, and serum GM were as follows: 0.731 [0.666-0.790], 0.869 [0.816-0.912], and 0.610 [0.540-0.676] with BL samples having the best diagnostic value. GM measurements in patients under posaconazole prophylaxis (n = 114) showed similar diagnostic performance. While specificity was similar between patients with and without posaconazole prophylaxis, sensitivity of GM measurements was lower in patients with prophylaxis. Analyses with patient classified according to antifungal treatment at the time of FOB procedure (n = 166) showed a decreased diagnostic accuracy in serum GM and BAL GM measurements related with the duration of treatment. However, BAL, BL, and serum GM measurements presented similar sensitivity and specificity in higher cut-off values in longer durations of antifungal treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that posaconazole prophylaxis and active short-term (3 days) antifungal treatment do not significantly affect overall diagnostic performance of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial lavage samples. However, using different cut-off values for patients receiving active treatment might be suggested to increase sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Hematología , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspergilosis Pulmonar Invasiva/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lavado Broncoalveolar , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Mananos/análisis
9.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(1): 152-162, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38029491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of ill-suited antibiotics is a significant risk factor behind the increase in the mortality, morbidity, and economic burden for patients who are under treatment for hematological malignancy (HM) and bloodstream infections (BSI). Such unfitting treatment choices intensify the evolution of resistant variants which is a public health concern due to possible healthcare-associated infection spread to the general population. Hence, this study aims to evaluate antibiograms of patients with BSI and risk factors associated with septicemia. METHODS: A total of 1166 febrile neutropenia episodes (FNE) among 513 patients with HM from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Qatar, during 2009-2019 were used for this study. The socio-demographic, clinical, microbial, and anti-microbial data retrieved from the patient's health records were used. RESULTS: We analyzed the sensitivity of gram-negative and gram-positive bacilli reported in HM-FN-BSI patients. Out of the total 512 microorganisms isolated, 416 (81%) were gram-negative bacteria (GNB), 76 (15%) were gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and 20 (4%) were fungi. Furthermore, in 416 GNB, 298 (71.6%) were Enterobacteriaceae sp. among which 121 (41%) were ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) resistant to Cephalosporine third generation and Piperacillin-Tazobactam, 54 (18%) were Carbapenem-resistant or multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO). It's noteworthy that the predominant infectious agents in our hospital include E. coli, Klebsiella species, and P. aeruginosa. Throughout the study period, the mortality rate due to BSI was 23%. Risk factors that show a significant correlation with death are age, disease status, mono or polymicrobial BSI and septic shock. CONCLUSION: Decision pertaining to the usage of antimicrobials for HM-FN-BSI patients is a critical task that relies on the latest pattern of prevalence, treatment resistance, and clinical outcomes. Analysis of the antibiogram of HM-FN-BSI patients in Qatar calls for a reconsideration of currently followed empirical antibiotic therapy towards better infection control and antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sepsis , Humanos , Escherichia coli , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/complicaciones , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Klebsiella , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiología , Neutropenia Febril/microbiología
10.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 40(2): 151-155, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37440312

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the difference in appropriateness of antimicrobial selection in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) after implementation of an institutional guideline, a dedicated pediatric emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist, and an electronic order set. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included febrile patients aged younger than 18 years who were at risk of neutropenia, as defined by our institutional algorithm. Charts were evaluated for inclusion by searching for patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) between February 2018 and January 2022 who had International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for patients at risk of FN. Three independent groups were compared before, during, and after interventions. A historical control group (group 1), postdedicated EM pharmacist and institutional guideline cohort (group 2), and postdedicated EM pharmacist, institutional guideline, and electronic order set cohort (group 3) were compared. Secondary outcomes included time from registration in the ED to administration of the first dose of empiric antimicrobials, days to defervescence, pediatric intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-eight charts were reviewed for inclusion. Among those included (n = 38), there was an increase in appropriate use of antimicrobials from 71% to 92% to 100% ( P = 0.1534) between group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively. In addition, the interventions in this study lead to an overall decrease in the median time from registration to first dose of antibiotics from 142 minutes to 72 minutes ( P = 0.1370). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the positive impact a pediatric EM pharmacist along with an institutional guideline and an electronic order set have on appropriate antimicrobial selection in pediatric FN patients. Institutions should consider multipronged approaches to improve the selection and time to administration of appropriate empiric antimicrobials in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Neutropenia Febril , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica , Humanos , Niño , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Farmacéuticos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
11.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 41(2): 89-102, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655541

RESUMEN

In low-risk febrile neutropenia (LR-FN), the safety of early discontinuation of empiric antibiotics without marrow recovery is not well established. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of procalcitonin (PCT) guided early discontinuation of antibiotics in LR-FN. In this trial, children with LR-FN with an afebrile period of at least 24 h, sterile blood culture, and negative/normalized PCT were randomized at 72 h of starting antibiotics into two groups: intervention arm and standard arm. The antibiotics were stopped in the intervention arm regardless of absolute neutrophil count (ANC), while in the standard arm, antibiotics were continued for at least 7 days or until recovery of ANC (>500/mm3). The primary objective was to determine the treatment failure rates, and the secondary objective was to compare the duration of antibiotics and all-cause mortality between the two arms. A total of 46 children with LR-FN were randomized to either the intervention arm (n = 23) or the standard arm (n = 23). Treatment failure was observed in 2/23 (8.7%) of patients in the intervention arm compared to 1/23 (4.3%) in the standard arm [RR: 2 (95% CI: 0.19-20.6); p = 0.55]. The median duration of antibiotics in the intervention arm and standard arm were 3 days vs 7 days (P= <0.001). There was no mortality in this study. PCT-guided early discontinuation of empirical antibiotics in LR-FN is feasible. There was no significant difference observed in treatment failure between the early discontinuation of antibiotics vs standard therapy. The total duration of antibiotic exposure was significantly lesser in the discontinuation arm. Further, larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm the finding of this study.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Niño , Humanos , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
13.
Aktuelle Urol ; 55(1): 38-43, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37607583

RESUMEN

Many systemic treatments used in genitourinary oncology negatively affect haematopoiesis, thus leading to neutropenia. Neutropenic patients are vulnerable to bacterial, and other infections. Often fever is the only symptom in these patients. Neutropenic fever is a major threat for these patients, as it may lead to life-threatening therapy complications that significantly impair the patient's quality of life, Moreover, it may also worsen the prognosis due to therapy delays or necessary dose modifications. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (GCSF), which can improve neutrophil granulocyte formation, are used both for supportive treatment in febrile neutropenia and for its prophylaxis. The correct indication for such GCSF support depends on the general risk of febrile neutropenia of the therapy used, as well as on individual patient factors and the treatment intent (palliative vs. curative). Based on the current recommendations both of the German and international guidelines, this article aims to provide an up-to-date and practice-oriented overview of the use of GCSF in uro-oncology.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Humanos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Neutrófilos , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre/etiología , Fiebre/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
Ther Drug Monit ; 46(1): 80-88, 2024 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Optimal cefepime dosing is a challenge because of its dose-dependent neurotoxicity. This study aimed to determine individualized cefepime dosing for febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 16 patients receiving cefepime at a dose of 2 g every 12 hours. Unbound concentrations were determined at 0.5 hours, 7.2 hours [at the 60% time point of the 12 hours administration interval (C7.2h)], and 11 hours (trough concentration) after the first infusion (rate: 2 g/h). The primary and secondary end points were the predictive performance of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve (AUC unbound ) and the effect of unbound cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters on clinical response, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (SD) AUC unbound was 689.7 (226.6) mcg h/mL, which correlated with C7.2h (R 2 = 0.90), and the Bayesian posterior AUC unbound using only the trough concentration (R 2 = 0.66). Although higher exposure was more likely to show a better clinical response, each parameter did not indicate a statistical significance between positive and negative clinical responses ( P = 0.0907 for creatinine clearance (Ccr), 0.2523 for C7.2h, 0.4079 for trough concentration, and 0.1142 for AUC unbound ). Cutoff values were calculated as 80.2 mL/min for Ccr (sensitivity: 0.889, specificity: 0.714), 18.6 mcg/mL for C7.2h (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000), and 9.2 mcg/mL for trough concentration (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000). When aiming for a time above 100% the minimum inhibitory concentration, both continuous infusion of 4 g/d and intermittent infusion of 2 g every 8 hours achieved a probability of approximately 100% at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 mcg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring by sampling at C7.2h or trough can facilitate rapid dose optimization. Continuous infusion of 4 g/d was recommended. Intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 hours was alternatively suggested for patients with a Ccr of 60-90 mL/min.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Linfoma , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Cefepima , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Teorema de Bayes , Monitoreo de Drogas , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 41(2): 172-178, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37293777

RESUMEN

Our aim was to identify national consensus criteria for the management of children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), for evidence-based step-down treatment approaches for patients classified at low risk of severe infection. In 2018, a five-section, 38-item survey was e-mailed to all pediatric hematology and oncology units in France (n = 30). The five sections contained statements on possible consensus criteria for the (i) definition of FN, (ii) initial management of children with FN, (iii) conditions required for initiating step-down therapy in low-risk patients, (iv) management strategy for low-risk patients, and (v) antibiotic treatment on discharge. Consensus was defined by respondents' combined answers (somewhat agree and strongly agree) at 75% or more. Sixty-five physicians (participation rate: 58%), all specialists in pediatric onco-hematology, from 18 centers completed the questionnaire. A consensus was reached on 22 of the 38 statements, including the definition of FN, the criteria for step-down therapy in low-risk children, and the initial care of these patients. There was no consensus on the type and duration of antibiotic therapy on discharge. In conclusion, a consensus has been reached on the criteria for initiating evidence-based step-down treatment of children with FN and a low risk of severe infection but not for the step-down antimicrobial regimen.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Niño , Humanos , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Consenso , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
16.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 20(2): 228-238, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127868

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients with cancer can cause severe infections, and prompt antibiotics are warranted. Extrapolated from other populations, a time-to-antibiotic (TTA) metric of <60 minutes after medical center presentation was established, with compliance data factoring into pediatric oncology program national rankings. METHODS: All FN episodes occurring at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital (2007-February 2022) and a sample of episodes from Colorado Children's Hospital (2012-2019) were abstracted, capturing TTA and clinical outcomes including major complications (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, vasopressors, intubation, or infection-related mortality). Odds ratios (ORs) were adjusted for age, treatment center, absolute neutrophil count, hypotension presence, stem-cell transplant status, and central line type. RESULTS: A total of 2,349 episodes were identified from Vanderbilt (1,920) and Colorado (429). Only 0.6% (n = 14) episodes required immediate ICU management, with a median TTA of 28 minutes (IQR, 20-37). For the remaining patients, the median TTA was 56 minutes (IQR, 37-90), and 54.3% received antibiotics in <60 minutes. There were no significant associations between TTA (<60 or ≥60 minutes) and major complications (adjusted OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59]; P = .98), and a TTA ≥60 minutes was not associated with any type of complication. Similarly, TTA, when evaluated as a continuous variable, was not associated with a major (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.04]; P = .69) nor any other complication in adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence that a reduced TTA improves clinical outcomes in pediatric oncology FN and thus it should not be used as a primary quality measure.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Humanos , Niño , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización , Oncología Médica
17.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 21: eAO0486, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126660

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of febrile neutropenia without primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients undergoing chemotherapy with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide, and to evaluate the toxicity profile of brand-name docetaxel (Taxotere ® ) and the generic formulation. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data obtained from electronic medical records of patients treated at a Brazilian cancer center. Patients with breast cancer who underwent adjuvant treatment between January 2016 and June 2019 were selected. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher correlation of variables, and multivariate analyses were adjusted for propensity score. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients with a mean age of 55.9 years at the time of treatment were included in the study. The majority (93.9%) had luminal histology, 84.8% were at clinical stage I, and 98.2% had a good performance status. The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia in the study population was 13.4% (31 cases). The use of brand-name docetaxel (Taxotere ® ) was the only factor associated with febrile neutropenia occurrence (OR= 3.55, 95%CI= 1.58-7.94, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: In patients with breast cancer who require treatment with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide regimen, the toxicity profile differs between brand-name and generic docetaxel. Regardless of the formulation used, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was less than 20%, which may allow for the omission of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
18.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(12): 687, 2023 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947888

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The prompt initiation of a betalactam antibiotic in febrile neutropenic patients is considered standard of care, while the empiric use of vancomycin is recommended by guidelines in specific situations, with a low level of evidence. The objective of this study was to assess the utilization of vancomycin in the management of febrile neutropenia within four Brazilian medical centers that implemented more stringent criteria for its administration. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed encompassing all instances of febrile neutropenia observed during the period from 2013 to 2019. The primary focus was to identify the reasons for initiating vancomycin therapy. RESULTS: A total of 536 consecutive episodes of febrile neutropenia were documented, involving 384 patients with a median age of 52 years (range 18-86). Chemotherapy preceded febrile neutropenia in 59.7% of cases, while 40.3% occurred after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The most prevalent underlying diseases were acute myeloid leukemia (26.5%) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (22%). According to international guidelines, vancomycin should have been initiated at the onset of fever in 145 episodes (27%); however, it was administered in only 27 cases (5.0%). Three episodes were associated with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, two of which were methicillin resistant. The 15-day and 30-day mortality rates were 5.0% and 9.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the notably low utilization rate of vancomycin in cases of febrile neutropenia, despite clear indications outlined in established guidelines. These findings emphasize the importance of carefully implementing guideline recommendations, considering local epidemiological factors, especially when the strength of recommendation is weak.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Vancomicina , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brasil , Fiebre/etiología , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente
19.
Med Mycol ; 61(12)2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37944000

RESUMEN

Fusarium species represent an opportunistic fungal pathogen. The data in Mexico about Fusarium infections in humans are scarce. Here, we present a retrospective series of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of fusariosis in eight different hospitals in Mexico from January 2010 to December 2019. The diagnosis of proven fusariosis was made according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (EORT/MSG) criteria. A total of 49 cases were identified in our series. Most patients had burn injuries (49%), and 37% had hematological malignancies. Most patients had fire injuries (40%), followed by electric injuries (8%), febrile neutropenia (10%), and pancytopenia (6%). Patients had skin and soft tissue involvement in 49%, followed by blood culture isolation and biopsies from different sites of the body (lung, sinuses, bone tissue, and eyes). Febrile neutropenia (10%) and fungemia (8%) were the most common clinical syndromes in immunosuppressed patients. Most patients received monotherapy (67%), where voriconazole was used in 30% of the cases, followed by conventional amphotericin B (16%), and lipidic formulations of amphotericin B in 10% (either liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B lipid complex). Combination therapy was used in 20% of the cases, and the most common combination therapy was triazole plus any lipidic formulation of amphotericin B (10%). Mortality related to Fusarium infection occurred in 22% of patients. Fusariosis is a serious threat. Burn injuries and hematologic malignancies represent the most common causes of infection in this small series from Mexico.


This study describes the epidemiological characteristics of patients with fusariosis from a multicenter cohort in Mexico. These findings provide information from this invasive fungal disease that threatens different countries in Latin America.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Neutropenia Febril , Fusariosis , Fusarium , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Fusariosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fusariosis/epidemiología , Fusariosis/veterinaria , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , México/epidemiología , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/veterinaria , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Quemaduras/veterinaria , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/veterinaria
20.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 73(10): 2065-2068, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37876072

RESUMEN

To assess whether prophylactic use of Levofloxacin would reduce the number of febrile neutropenia episodes during the induction phase, a single-centre, case-control study was carried out. Data was collected prospectively of patients who received Levofloxacin prophylaxis during the induction chemotherapy from September 2019 till October 2020. The cases were compared with historical controls who did not receive antibiotics prophylaxis. A total of 121 patients were enrolled, among which 61 patients were cases, whereas 60 patients were controls. The patients who received Levofloxacin prophylaxis had lower rate of febrile neutropenia episodes than patients who did not receive any prophylaxis (p≤0.01) (odds ratio [OR]:0.23, CI 95%). No significant difference in induction mortality was seen between the two groups (p≤0.14). Levofloxacin prophylaxis reduced the rate of febrile neutropenia episodes among patients, but it did not affect the infection related mortality.


Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , Niño , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Pakistán/epidemiología , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...